Home
Author Guide
Editor Guide
Reviewer Guide
Special Issues
Special Issue Introduction
Special Issues List
Topics
Published Issues
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
journal menu
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing Service
Article Processing Charge
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Digital Preservation Policy
Editorial Process
Subscription
Contact Us
General Information
ISSN:
1796-2021 (Online); 2374-4367 (Print)
Abbreviated Title:
J. Commun.
Frequency:
Monthly
DOI:
10.12720/jcm
Abstracting/Indexing:
Scopus
;
DBLP
;
CrossRef
,
EBSCO
,
Google Scholar
;
CNKI,
etc.
E-mail questions
or comments to
editor@jocm.us
Acceptance Rate:
27%
APC:
800 USD
Average Days to Accept:
88 days
3.4
2023
CiteScore
51st percentile
Powered by
Article Metrics in Dimensions
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Maode Ma
College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
I'm very happy and honored to take on the position of editor-in-chief of JCM, which is a high-quality journal with potential and I'll try my every effort to bring JCM to a next level...
[Read More]
What's New
2024-11-25
Vol. 19, No. 11 has been published online!
2024-10-16
Vol. 19, No. 10 has been published online!
2024-08-20
Vol. 19, No. 8 has been published online!
Home
>
Published Issues
>
2019
>
Volume 14, No. 10, October 2019
>
Experiences on Evaluating Network Simulators: A Methodological Approach
Michel Bakni
1
, Yudith Cardinale
2
, Luis Manuel Moreno
2
1. Univ. Bordeaux, ESTIA, F-64210 Bidart, France
2. Dpto. de Computación y T.I, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela
Abstract—
There exists a variety of network simulators, used to imitate the protocols, nodes, and connections in data networks. They differ in their design, goals, and characteristics. Thus, comparing simulators requires a clear and standardized methodology. In this paper, based on a set of measurable and comparable criteria, we propose an approach to evaluate them. We validate the suggested approach with two network simulators, namely Packet Tracer and GNS3. In that regard, a test scenario is put forward on the two simulators, both in Linux and Windows environments, and their performance is monitored based on the suggested approach. This paper does not propose a method for selecting the best simulator, but it rather supplies the researchers with an evaluation tool, that can be used to describe, compare, and select the most suitable network simulators for a given scenario.
Index Terms—
Network simulators, evaluation criteria, comparison approach, packet tracer, GNS3.
Cite: Michel Bakni, Yudith Cardinale, and Luis Manuel Moreno, "Experiences on Evaluating Network Simulators: A Methodological Approach,” vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 866-875, 2019. Doi: 10.12720/jcm.14.10.866-875.
1-CP001
PREVIOUS PAPER
First page
NEXT PAPER
Flooding-Based Network Monitoring for Mobile Wireless Networks