Home
Author Guide
Editor Guide
Reviewer Guide
Special Issues
Special Issue Introduction
Special Issues List
Topics
Published Issues
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
journal menu
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing Service
Article Processing Charge
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Digital Preservation Policy
Editorial Process
Subscription
Contact Us
General Information
ISSN:
1796-2021 (Online); 2374-4367 (Print)
Abbreviated Title:
J. Commun.
Frequency:
Monthly
DOI:
10.12720/jcm
Abstracting/Indexing:
Scopus
;
DBLP
;
CrossRef
,
EBSCO
,
Google Scholar
;
CNKI,
etc.
E-mail questions
or comments to
editor@jocm.us
Acceptance Rate:
27%
APC:
800 USD
Average Days to Accept:
88 days
3.4
2023
CiteScore
51st percentile
Powered by
Article Metrics in Dimensions
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Maode Ma
College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
I'm very happy and honored to take on the position of editor-in-chief of JCM, which is a high-quality journal with potential and I'll try my every effort to bring JCM to a next level...
[Read More]
What's New
2024-11-25
Vol. 19, No. 11 has been published online!
2024-10-16
Vol. 19, No. 10 has been published online!
2024-08-20
Vol. 19, No. 8 has been published online!
Home
>
Published Issues
>
2019
>
Volume 14, No. 12, December 2019
>
Comparison of the Proactive and Reactive Algorithms for Load Balancing in UDN Networks
Mohamad Salhani
Aalto University, Espoo, 02150, Finland
Abstract
—Ultra-Dense Networks (UDNs) were introduced to support high data rate services and improve the network capacity. The load across the small cells is unevenly distributed owing to random deployment of small cells, the mobility of user equipments (UEs) and the preference of small cells during the selection/reselection. The unbalanced load causes performance degradation in both the throughput and successful handovers. Moreover, it may be responsible for radio link failures as well. To address this problem, this paper proposes different proactive algorithms to balance the load across UDN small cells and compare them to previous reactive algorithms. Proactive algorithms distribute the UEs, one by one, to the access points (APs), while the reactive ones are only triggered when the load of the chosen small-cell cluster reaches a predefined threshold. The numerical analysis shows that the load distribution achieved by the proactive algorithm with user rejection is better than that in the reactive algorithms by 34.97%. In addition, the impact of the small-cell cluster layout on the load balancing results is also studied in this paper. The results indicate that the load distribution and the balance improvement ratio in the intersecting small-cell model outperform those in the sequential small-cell one by 48.98% and 22.43%, respectively.
Index Terms
—UDN, reactive algorithms, proactive algorithm with rejection, proactive algorithm without rejection, intersecting small-cell model, sequential small-cell model
Cite: Mohamad Salhani, “Comparison of the Proactive and Reactive Algorithms for Load Balancing in UDN Networks,” Journal of Communications vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1119-1126, 2019. Doi: 10.12720/jcm.14.12.1119-1126
2-T1003
PREVIOUS PAPER
BlueArch–An Implementation of 5G Testbed
NEXT PAPER
Developing A Highly Accurate Pointing System for Free Space Optical Communications