Home
Author Guide
Editor Guide
Reviewer Guide
Special Issues
Special Issue Introduction
Special Issues List
Topics
Published Issues
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
journal menu
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing Service
Article Processing Charge
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Digital Preservation Policy
Editorial Process
Subscription
Contact Us
General Information
ISSN:
1796-2021 (Online); 2374-4367 (Print)
Abbreviated Title:
J. Commun.
Frequency:
Monthly
DOI:
10.12720/jcm
Abstracting/Indexing:
Scopus
;
DBLP
;
CrossRef
,
EBSCO
,
Google Scholar
;
CNKI,
etc.
E-mail questions
or comments to
editor@jocm.us
Acceptance Rate:
27%
APC:
800 USD
Average Days to Accept:
88 days
3.4
2023
CiteScore
51st percentile
Powered by
Article Metrics in Dimensions
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Maode Ma
College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
I'm very happy and honored to take on the position of editor-in-chief of JCM, which is a high-quality journal with potential and I'll try my every effort to bring JCM to a next level...
[Read More]
What's New
2024-11-25
Vol. 19, No. 11 has been published online!
2024-10-16
Vol. 19, No. 10 has been published online!
2024-08-20
Vol. 19, No. 8 has been published online!
Home
>
Published Issues
>
2022
>
Volume 17, No. 7, July 2022
>
Comparison of Automatic Modulation Classification Techniques
Salah Ayad Jassim
1,2
and Ibrahim Khider
1
1. Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Engineering, Dept of Electronics, Sudan
2. Al-Maarif University College, Dep. of Computer Engineering Techniques, Ramadi, Iraq
Abstract
—The advancement of digital communication and technology triggered new challenges related to the channel and radio spectrum utilization. From the other hand, real-time communications are keen of time where requests need to be processed in very short time. Automatic modulation is one of promising approaches that relies on pretrained classifiers in order to recognize the type of modulation techniques used by the transmitter. Considering that noise is dominating between the transmitter and receiver, the task of automatic modulation classification is become harder. Noise is destroying the obvious features of the signals and degrade the classification accuracy. The modulation identification technique is made to recognize the type of modulation using the deep learning technology. This paper is listing the common stat of the arts used in automatic modulation classification along with their performance measures. It was realized that deep learning classifier manifested in Conventional Neural Network (CNN) is outperformed in AMC scoring of 85.41 % of recognition accuracy.
Index Terms
—Modulation, CNN, AMC, classification
Cite: Salah Ayad Jassim and Ibrahim Khider, "Comparison of Automatic Modulation Classification Techniques," Journal of Communications vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 574-580, July 2022. Doi: 10.12720/jcm.17.7.574-580
Copyright © 2022 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the article is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
9-JCM170861
PREVIOUS PAPER
Route Discovery Using Hybrid Approach for Disaster Management in MANET
NEXT PAPER
Implementation of Satellite Road Image Denoising using Iterative Domain Guided Image Filtering with Gray World Optimization